Frederick Tyrrell - bibliography

Bibliography

• The Lectures of Sir Astley Cooper on the principles and practice of surgery, with additional notes and cases by Frederick Tyrrell.
  London, Thomas & George Underwood, 1824-1827.
• The lectures of Sir Astley Cooper on the principles and practice of surgery, with additional notes and cases by Frederick Tyrrell.
  3 volumes. Philadelphia : A. Sherman, 1826.
• Clinical lectures at St. Thomas’s Hospital.
  The Lancet, London, June 19, 1824, I: 379-382.
  The Lancet, July 10, 1824, II: 56-60 – July 17: 84-90 – July 24: 112-120 – July 31: 145-151 – August 7: 172-181 – August 21: 245-250 – August 28: 279-284 – September 4: 310-315 – September 11: 340-347 – September 18: 377-379 – September 25: 404-408.
• Operation of removing the arch and spinous process of the twelfth dorsal vertebra. The Lancet, London, 1927.
• An introductory lecture on anatomy. Delivered at the New Medical School, Aldersgate-Street, October 23, 1826. London, 1827.
• Syllabus on a course of lectures on the principles and practice of surgery.
  London, 1833.
• Observations on the catarrhal and catarrho-rheumatic ophthalmia.
  Medical Quertely Review, London, 1834.
• Amaurosis.
  In: William B. Costello, The Cyclopaedia of Practical Surgery, 1837.
• The lectures of Sir Astley Cooper on the principles and practice of surgery, with additional notes and cases by Frederick Tyrrell.
  Fifth American, from the last London edition. Complete in one volume.
  Philadelphia : Haswell, Barrington, and Haswell ; New-Orleans : Alexander Towar, 1839. 580 pages.
• A practical work on the diseases of the eye, and their treatment, medically, topically, and by operation.
  2 volumes. London : Metcalf for John Churchill, 1840. 2 volumes, 533 + 566 pages.
  A peculiar feature of this work is the almost total absence of any reference to the work of others. Saunders (326) and Farre (ibid.) receive passing notice, but the work of the author's immediate predecessors at the Eye Infirmary, Travers (379) and Lawrence (231.1-233.1), goes completely unrecognized. This absence of historical material provided the focus for the criticisms of the work which appeared in the London Medical Gazette [27:245-248 (1840)] and The Lancet [2:449-457 (1839-1840)]. The Lancet reviewer concluded, "Had we, ourselves, proceeded on the principle pursued by Mr. Tyrrell, we should not have reviewed his writings at all."